Connect with us

BUSINESS

SEBI Moves the Angel Fund Investor Deadline to March 2027

SEBI moved the Angel Funds accredited investor deadline to March 31, 2027, one day early, with only 3,820 accredited investors nationwide.

Published

on

SEBI on September 7, 2026 moved the accredited-investor deadline for existing Angel Funds to March 31, 2027, one day before the old cutoff. Funds registered on or before September 10, 2025 may still offer deals to as many as 200 non-accredited investors through that new date.

The circular takes effect at once. After March 31, 2027 those same funds cannot take a fresh contribution from a non-accredited investor for an investee company. Money already in the fund stays there under each private placement memorandum.

The Circular Landed One Day Before the Old Deadline

The Board’s relaxation in the accredited-investor timeline is circular HO/19/34/11(7)2025-AFD-POD1/I/20626/2026. It answers requests from the Alternative Investment Fund industry for more time to put existing Angel Funds onto the accredited-only rule.

That rule was not a surprise. SEBI amended the AIF Regulations on September 9, 2025 and, the next day, told older funds they had until September 8, 2026 to stop taking non-accredited cheques, with a 200-person cap in the meantime. The extra window now runs from September 9, 2026 through March 31, 2027, nearly seven months, and 204 days on the calendar.

THE DATES THAT MOVED THE WALL

  1. 2013: SEBI first recognised Angel Funds under Chapter III-A of the AIF Regulations.
  2. September 9, 2025: The Second Amendment Regulations make accredited investors the only eligible class for Angel Funds.
  3. September 10, 2025: A circular sets a one-year glide path for funds already on the books, ending September 8, 2026.
  4. June 3, 2026: Those conditions sit in Chapter 8 of the AIF Master Circular.
  5. September 3, 2026: Public comments close on a separate paper that would widen who can be accredited.
  6. September 7, 2026: SEBI extends the Angel Fund glide path to March 31, 2027.

The September 7 text, as later summarised from the circular, leaves the rest of Chapter 8 in place. The delay is the onboarding clock, not a rewrite of how Angel Funds invest.

Existing Funds Keep 200 Non-Accredited Slots Until March 2027

The stay applies only to Angel Funds registered with SEBI on or before September 10, 2025. During the extra months they may still offer an investment to non-accredited people, but not to more than 200 of them. Managers still have to check, deal by deal, that each person putting money into a company is accredited, holds a valid certificate, or counts as a deemed accredited investor under Regulation 2(1)(ab).

TWO CLOCKS FOR TWO SETS OF FUNDS

Rule Registered on or before September 10, 2025 Registered after September 10, 2025
Accredited-only deadline March 31, 2027 Already in force
Non-accredited investors in the gap Up to 200 None
Fresh non-accredited money after the wall Not allowed after March 31, 2027 Never allowed
Cheques already in the fund Held under the PPM and fund papers Held under the PPM and fund papers

That split is the fundraising fact hiding under the extension. An older vehicle can still tap a 200-person book of wealthy people who have not sat through accreditation. A fund licensed after September 10, 2025 cannot. For the next several months, vintage is a licence to raise.

How Thin Is India’s Accredited Investor Pool?

Angel Funds exist to write small, high-risk cheques into start-ups. SEBI’s 2025 rewrite tried to make sure every person in those deals had been checked as rich enough, and willing enough, to lose the money. The check is a certificate from an accreditation agency, usually an exchange or depository subsidiary, unless the investor is already deemed accredited (governments, QIBs, Category I FPIs, sovereign wealth funds, multilateral agencies).

The certificate class is still small. Payal Agarwal, a partner at Vinod Kothari Consultants, and Jayesh Rudra, an executive there, counted 103 registered Angel Funds with commitments of Rs 10,138 crore as of March 31, 2025. They also flagged that India had only 649 accredited investors as of May 2025, a base too thin, they wrote, for early-stage funding if the old angels were shut out.

THE POOL THE NEW RULE NEEDS

  • 103 funds: Angel Funds on SEBI’s register as of March 31, 2025, per Vinod Kothari Consultants.
  • Rs 10,138 crore: Capital committed to those funds on the same date.
  • 3,820 people: Accredited investors nationwide as of July 31, 2026, in SEBI’s consultation paper.
  • 200 per fund: Non-accredited investors still allowed in a grandfathered book until March 31, 2027.

SEBI’s August 2026 review of the accredited investor framework put the live count at 3,820 as of July 31, 2026, up from 649 in May 2025. Those investors held AIF units with a par value of about Rs 1.91 lakh crore as of December 31, 2025, close to 30 percent of AIF investments. The same paper still called the absolute number modest next to the people who could qualify.

Comments on that paper closed on September 3, 2026. Four days later the Angel Fund clock moved. The two files belong together. The Board is trying to grow the accredited class with one hand, and with the other it is refusing to shut the old 200-person channel until that class is larger.

A national pool of 3,820 certificates also has to serve AI-only AIF schemes, co-investment vehicles, large-value funds, and portfolio products, not just Angel Funds. Even if every grandfathered vehicle used its full 200-person non-accredited quota, that book would dwarf the verified list the new rule treats as the only safe source of start-up risk capital.

The Old Rs 2 Crore Angel Versus the New Tests

The people who lose access, once the wall finally goes up, are not retail traders. They are the old “angel investor” class in the AIF Regulations: individuals with net tangible assets of at least Rs 2 crore, excluding a main home, plus early-stage investing experience, a serial-founder record, or ten years in senior management. Bodies corporate needed a net worth of Rs 10 crore. An AIF or an old venture capital fund could also write the cheque.

Accreditation is a different, and higher, paper test. It does not ask whether the person has sat on a start-up board. It asks for income and financial assets, then a third-party certificate that usually lasts one year, or two years if the tests were met for the previous three.

WHO COULD WRITE THE CHEQUE, THEN AND NOW

Test Old angel investor Accredited investor
Individual wealth Net tangible assets above Rs 2 crore, home excluded, plus experience Annual income of Rs 2 crore, or net worth of Rs 7.5 crore with Rs 3.75 crore in financial assets, or income of Rs 1 crore plus net worth of Rs 5 crore with Rs 2.5 crore in financial assets
Company wealth Net worth above Rs 10 crore Net worth of at least Rs 50 crore
Who checks The fund, against the old regulation An accreditation agency, unless the investor is deemed accredited
Cap on heads in a book 200 in a scheme, under the old design No cap once everyone is accredited

Agarwal and Rudra wrote that the mandatory accreditation step “would be a primary factor that may lead to elimination of many investors who were earlier eligible.” A person can clear Rs 2 crore of assets and a decade in a company and still miss Rs 7.5 crore of net worth or Rs 2 crore of income. Those are the names still filling the 200 slots.

Once a book is accredited-only, the 200-person lid comes off, because SEBI treats a verified accredited investor as a QIB for this product and the Companies Act private-placement cap no longer bites in the same way. That is the bargain: fewer eligible people, then no headcount cap. The extension says the first half of that bargain is not ready.

Funds Registered After September 10 Already Live Under the Harder Rule

Any Angel Fund SEBI registered after September 10, 2025 already had to onboard accredited investors only. The September 7 circular does not give those vehicles a 200-person side door. They also have to land at least five accredited investors before declaring a first close, and they cannot declare that close later than 12 months after SEBI takes their PPM on record.

That is a colder raise. The manager cannot fill a round with a familiar syndicate of Rs 2 crore angels while certificates crawl through an agency. Each deal still needs at least two investors, so a single accredited cheque cannot be dressed up as an Angel Fund investment.

Older funds that had not yet declared a first close were told, in the September 10, 2025 circular, to do so on or before September 8, 2026, or refile the PPM and pay the fee again. The new circular, as described, extends the accredited-investor onboarding date. It does not, in the public summaries, reopen that first-close clock.

Startup Policy Forum Asked for Time and Got It

Shweta Rajpal Kohli, president and CEO of Startup Policy Forum, wrote on September 7 that her group had been pressing for the delay on behalf of angel funds, and called the circular a welcome relief.

Startup Policy Forum had been advocating this on behalf of angel funds. A welcome relief.

Shweta Rajpal Kohli, President and CEO, Startup Policy Forum, on X

Atul Jha, founder of the fund-operations firm Taghash, called it a welcome extension that gives existing Angel Funds more time to line up onboarding and compliance with the new rule. The ask was operational, and it was also about the investor list. Converting a 200-person book means certificates, net-worth letters, and a one-year (or two-year) validity clock, not a memo in the PPM.

SEBI had already tried to sand some of that friction. A January 9, 2026 circular let managers provisionally onboard people who were still waiting on a certificate, dropped the demand for a detailed net-worth annexure, and made it optional for a chartered accountant to print the actual net-worth figure. The accredited count did rise. It did not rise enough for the Board to let the September 8 wall stand.

The Rest of the 2025 Rewrite Still Stands

The glide path is only about who may put money in. The rest of the revised regulatory framework for Angel Funds, signed by Aparna Thyagarajan, chief general manager, is already live. Angel Funds no longer launch schemes. They invest at fund level, keep a term sheet for each deal, and file a PPM through a merchant banker at registration.

WHAT CHANGED FOR THE CHEQUE ITSELF

  • Ticket size: Minimum investment in a company fell to Rs 10 lakh from Rs 25 lakh; the cap rose to Rs 25 crore from Rs 10 crore, including follow-on money.
  • Follow-on: A fund may put more money into a company that has left start-up status if its post-issue shareholding does not exceed the pre-issue percentage, and only from investors who were in the first round, pro rata.
  • Lock-in: One year, or six months if the exit is a sale to a third party rather than a buyback or a promoter purchase.
  • Skin in the game: The sponsor or manager must keep 0.5 percent of each investment, or Rs 50,000, whichever is higher.
  • Related parties: An investor who is a related party of the investee, under the listing-regulations definition, cannot put money into that company through the fund.
  • Audit trigger: Annual PPM-compliance audit applies once total investments at cost exceed Rs 100 crore, from financial year 2025-26.

Those rules were sold as ease of doing business and as risk control in the same sentence. The accredited-only gate was the control. Moving it to March 31, 2027 leaves the investment mechanics in force and keeps the old investor class in the book for one more cycle of start-up cheques.

After March 31, 2027, the grandfathered funds will not be allowed to take a fresh contribution from a non-accredited investor for an investee company. Existing holdings stay in place under each fund’s PPM.

Disclaimer: This article is news reporting and analysis of a SEBI circular, and it is for information only. It does not constitute investment advice, legal advice, or a recommendation to invest in Angel Funds, start-ups, or Alternative Investment Funds. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered investment adviser or a qualified securities lawyer before taking any fundraising or investment decision. Figures, registration cutoffs, and deadlines reflect the circulars and papers cited and may change if the Board issues a further amendment.

Harry is the editor of AN TV NEWS, an independent news site he owns and runs, and his ten years in journalism went first into reporting and then into editing. Breaking news is where his method shows most clearly. When a story is moving, he publishes only what has been confirmed by an official statement, a court record, a company filing or a named participant, marks what is still unverified, and updates the piece with timestamps as the facts settle rather than guessing ahead of them. That discipline applies to everything the site covers for a worldwide audience, from news, business and technology to science, sports, entertainment, lifestyle, travel, auto and gaming. He checks every number before it is published, keeps a public corrections policy, and logs corrections on the article itself so readers can see what was changed and when. Questions, tips and complaints reach him directly at support@antv.news.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending